Tuesday, June 18, 2024
HomeTech NewsSnapdragon 888 vs. Dimensity 7300: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Efficiency

Snapdragon 888 vs. Dimensity 7300: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Efficiency


Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888, released in late 2020, remains popular in mid-range smartphones despite being a few years old. In contrast, MediaTek’s Dimensity 7300, announced in May 2024, is a newer competitor. Both chips offer distinct advantages and are built on different manufacturing processes, with the Dimensity 7300 using TSMC’s 4nm node and the Snapdragon 888 utilizing Samsung’s 5nm node. This article provides a detailed comparison to help you understand how these two processors stack up against each other in terms of performance, power efficiency, and features.

Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 7300 comparison:

Qualcomm released the Snapdragon 888 in late 2020, while MediaTek announced the Dimensity 7300 in May 2024. Despite being a three-year-old chip, the Snapdragon 888 remains popular among mid-range phones. But how does it compare with MediaTek’s newer Dimensity 7300? Let’s find out.

FeatureDimensity 7300Snapdragon 888
Process NodeTSMC 4nmSamsung 5nm
CPU Cores88
CPU Architecture4 x Cortex-A78 @ 2.5 GHz
4 x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
1 x Cortex-X1 @ 2.8 GHz
3 x Cortex-A78 @ 2.4 GHz
4 x Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz
GPUArm Mali-G615 MC2Adreno 660
NPUMediaTek APU 655Hexagon 780
UFS 3.1 storage
UFS 3.1 storage
CameraImagiq 950 12-bit ISP
Up to 200MP sensor
Up to 4K videos @ 30 FPS
Spectra 580 14-bit ISP
Up to 200MP sensor
Up to 8K videos @ 30 FPS
DisplayWFHD+ @ 120Hz
Full HD+ @ 144Hz
4K Ultra HD @ 60Hz
QHD+ @ 144Hz
ConnectivityMediaTek 5G R16 modem
Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.4
Snapdragon X60 5G modem
Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.2


The Dimensity 7300 is equipped with four Cortex-A78 performance cores clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 power-efficient cores running at 2.0 GHz. The Snapdragon 888 features a Cortex-X1 prime core at 2.8 GHz, three Cortex-A78 performance cores at 2.4 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz.

Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 7300 comparison

The Cortex-X1 prime core gives the Snapdragon 888 an edge in demanding tasks like gaming and intensive multitasking. However, the Dimensity 7300’s more power-efficient core configuration offers better battery life.

GPU and Gaming:

The Snapdragon 888’s Adreno 660 GPU is more powerful but consumes more power compared to the Dimensity 7300’s Arm Mali-G615 MC2 GPU. While the Snapdragon 888 excels in high-end gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, the Dimensity 7300 provides longer battery life. Both chips have gaming optimizations, with the Snapdragon 888 featuring Snapdragon Elite Gaming and the Dimensity 7300 using MediaTek HyperEngine.

AI and NPU:

The Dimensity 7300 uses the MediaTek NPU 655, which offers 2x performance over its predecessor. It supports AI camera enhancements and integrates with MediaTek HyperEngine for better gaming performance. The Snapdragon 888’s Hexagon 780 is a powerful NPU optimized for low power consumption and high performance, capable of 26 trillion operations per second (TOPS).

Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 7300 comparison


Both chips support up to 200MP single camera sensors, but the Snapdragon 888 can record up to 8K videos at 30 FPS, while the Dimensity 7300 is limited to 4K at 30 FPS. The Dimensity 7300’s Imagiq 950 ISP offers features like precise noise reduction and video HDR. The Snapdragon 888’s Spectra 580 ISP supports real-time object classification and advanced low-light photography.


Both the Dimensity 7300 and Snapdragon 888 offer excellent connectivity features, including Wi-Fi 6E, 5G, and support for various satellite systems. The Dimensity 7300 has a peak downlink speed of 3.27 Gbps, slightly lower than the Snapdragon 888’s 3.6 Gbps.


The Snapdragon 888 excels in performance, connectivity, and display resolution, making it ideal for users who prioritize performance. However, the Dimensity 7300 offers better power efficiency and battery life, making it a great choice for those seeking a balance between performance and battery consumption. Both chips have their strengths, so the best choice depends on your specific needs and priorities.


Follow Us